Multilingual NLP
Where capabilities that hold in English degrade elsewhere — and what that degradation curve actually looks like across typologically distant languages.
नमस्ते Nepali
M.S. Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder/advised by Alexis Palmer
I work on natural language processing for languages that the field has mostly skipped. Nearly every technique that makes large language models fast, cheap, or steerable was developed and measured in English — and a surprising number of them quietly stop working somewhere else.
Our recent work shows this concretely for speculative decoding. The speed-ups everyone quotes hold up in English and then thin out, language by language, as training resources disappear. The interesting part isn't that it degrades; it's why the obvious fixes don't repair it.
I grew up in Nepal. Nepali has around 32 million speakers and almost no NLP infrastructure, which makes it a recurring test case in my work rather than a footnote. I also build things — production ML systems, developer tools, infrastructure — because the engineering keeps the research honest.
A question I keep coming back to: will we ever be able to map emotion as data cleanly enough that a network can learn it?
Where capabilities that hold in English degrade elsewhere — and what that degradation curve actually looks like across typologically distant languages.
Speculative decoding, drafting, distillation. Making generation cheap without quietly making it worse for a subset of users.
Nepali and other languages with tens of millions of speakers and almost no NLP infrastructure. Data scarcity as a design constraint, not a caveat.
Metrics and benchmarks that don't silently assume English, and that surface the failures an aggregate number hides.
I'm always glad to talk about multilingual NLP, efficient inference, or language technology for communities the field overlooks. If you're working on something in that space — or you just want the details behind a paper — write to me.